|
"Why do Catholics
pray to saints; isn't that wrong? We should only
worship and pray to God". |
Say
that you and I are friends; if I ask you to pray
for me, would you do so? You would, I hope.
The saints are men and women whose lives have
been transformed by Christ and the Holy Spirit
and lived their lives according to that
transformation. Richard McBrien, a theologian,
says so beautifully, "Saints are holy people,
who have on balance, lived their lives in
conformity with the gospel. The words *on
balance * are crucial here, because it is not
the case that saints neither committed sins nor
had any personal faults and weaknesses. The
saints were as human as any of us, but they
somehow managed to rise above the standard of
ordinary human behavior and manifest heroic
virtue when it counted most.
The Church is a community, but not just any
community. It is a community of those who have
been transformed by Christ and the Holy Spirit.
Since transformation is a process, to be
completed when the Kingdom of God is fully
realized at the end of history, our bond in
Christ and the Spirit is not broken by death..
It is a bond of brothers and sisters in the
Lord, the very Body of Christ on the way to
achieving the fullness of God (Eph 3:19)".
So devotion, not worship, to the saints, is
ultimately devotion to Christ. We pray to saints
to ask them to intercede on our behalf and pray
for us to Christ. |
|
"Some of the
Catholic Church's teachings aren't in the Bible.
Why should we believe anything that's not in
Scripture?" |
Again the theologian, Richard McBrien, explains
so well that "Scripture itself is a product of
Tradition. It is not as if you first have
Scripture and then you have Tradition. Tradition
(upper case) comes before and during, and not
just after, the writing of Sacred Scripture. In
fact, careful study of the various books of the
Bible, including the Gospels, themselves,
discloses several layers of tradition from which
the individual books have emerged and taken
final form, Those traditions may be oral
(preaching), liturgical (prayer formulas),
narrative (recollection of important events,
especially Jesus* passion), and so
forth......from which the New Testament authors
worked..... and needs to be differentiated from
traditions (lower case), ie: obligatory priestly
celibacy and other examples which include
customary ways of doing or expressing matters
related to faith. If a tradition cannot be
rejected or lost without essential distortion of
the Gospel, it is part of Tradition itself."
It's important to remember that Tradition never
contradicts the Bible.
|
|
"Aren't all those
statues in the Catholic Church the same as
worshipping graven images?" |
First, one must understand what a graven image
is in the context of the Old Testament. To make
a graven image is to create an image out of some
medium, such as clay or wood, and worship it as
a God. The statues or pictures of Mary are not
worshipped as a God. If a Catholic worships a
statue of Mary as a God, they are guilty of
idolatry.
The Lord did not forbid the making of images. In
fact, God commanded Moses to shape a brazen
serpent. This serpent was able to cure the
people of the serpent bite, if they looked upon
it (Numbers 21:8). Later, when the people turned
to idolatry of the serpent, Hezekiah had it
destroyed (II Kings 18:4). Here you see the
balance. Images are good, if they are helpful,
but not if they encourage idolatry.
Moreover, the Lord commanded that the image of
two Cherubim be constructed on the top of the
Ark of the Covenant on either side of the Mercy
seat. Was this the sin of idolatry? I think not.
Mary is the mother of God and the saints are the
friends of God. If keeping their pictures or
statues helps to inspire us to a more holy life,
then it is a good thing. Don't you have pictures
of your family in your home? Is this idolatry?
Or when someone dies, should you destroy all
images or pictures of them, lest you be guilty
of worshipping them?
|
|
Did Jesus have
actual brothers and sisters? |
Matthew 12:47 and Matthew 13:55 make reference
to brothers and sisters of Jesus, so many sects
claim that the Blessed Virgin Mary and St.
Joseph had offspring in the natural sense, an
attack on the perpetual virginity of the Blessed
Virgin Mary. This error in interpretation comes
about because the reader takes the scripture out
of its cultural context.
In the Hebrew and Aramaic the word for brother
and kinman is the same, so James, Joseph, and
Jude were kinsmen, relatives (Matthew 13:55).
This is a common attitude in Mediterranean and
Semitic cultures. For instance, the Apostle
James is the Son of Alpheus (Matthew 10:3, Mark
3:18, Luke 6:15) and brother of the Apostle
Matthew Levi (Mark 2:14) and the Apostle Jude
(Luke 6:16, Acts 1:13), yet this Apostle is
specifically referred to by Paul as the brother
of Jesus (Galations 1:19). He can't be referring
to James the Greater, because he is a son of
Zebedee as well as the Apostle John. Surely the
Virgin Mary did not have more than one husband!
|
|
More
questions/answers coming soon! |
| |
next page:
our
lady history |